There’s a common belief about Western novels, practically a law,
that the hero always saves the day and good always triumphs over evil. And,
truth be told, that’s the formula behind most, almost all, Western novels.
But there are books that defy the doctrine and go a different way,
presenting a more nuanced—you could say more realistic—way of seeing things.
Some of them become classics.
One such is The Ox-Bow Incident by the late Nevada writer Walter
Van Tilburg Clark. There is no hero in its pages, the day is not saved, and
there is no triumph of good over evil—just the opposite, in fact. And yet upon
publication in 1940 the novel achieved eminence, and has maintained its place
among the best Western novels of all time, widely considered a masterpiece.
It just goes to show, I suppose, that while there is safety for
Western writers and Western novels in following the herd, there is more than
one trail that leads to success.
And, to my way of thinking, to better books.
Writer Rod Miller's musings and commentary on writing and reading about cowboys and the American West, Western novels and short stories, poetry and music, history and nonfiction, magazines and art.
Saturday, November 28, 2020
My Favorite Book, Part 24
Wednesday, November 18, 2020
New York speaks.
“It’s all
presented in a relaxed, steady style that melds what we think we know about the
Old West with what it actually was like….
[T]he story
belongs to Pinebox, whose character and trade we also get to learn about
through subtly sketched detail. His voice is laconic, erudite, wryly humorous,
and feels true to the period. He salts his narrative with colorful one-liners,
such as ‘Abilene had grown like a litter of pigs’ and a saloon with ‘empty
tables as rare as hair on a billiard ball….’
Rod Miller’s
skills and knowledge, combined with a natural storyteller’s knack, make Pinebox
Collins
both a great introduction to the genre and an enlightening addition to it."
Some writers say they never read reviews of their books. I read this one. You can too, right here: https://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/pinebox-collins.
Sunday, November 8, 2020
Really stupid words, Chapter 14.
For several years now there has been a tendency among us, when bereft
of any logical argument against an opposing point of view, to sniff in derision
and make a weak-kneed accusation of “political correctness.” It’s easy to do
and allows us to simply—and thoughtlessly—dismiss people and ideas we disagree
with.
When I was a young man (or old boy), I tended to run in packs that
were (as we put it) rude, crude, and unabashed. And, in some sick way, we were amused
by it. We poked oafish fun and made mean jokes based on race, ethnicity,
physical appearance, religion, sexual orientation, employment, politics, ideas,
points of view, or anything else we thought might get a laugh—no matter how
cruel or heartless.
In hindsight, it wasn’t funny. Even then. And though it took too
many years to outgrow those ways of thinking, I like to think they are behind
me. I hope so.
A common defense, usually heard just prior to an accusation of “political
correctness” is that “those people” are just thin-skinned and too easily offended.
Well.
I do not get to decide what offends you or anyone else. Likewise,
it is not up to you to decide what I or anybody else finds offensive. Or cruel.
Or hurtful.
It seems to me that anyone who claims to be guided by any kind of
moral compass would make every effort to avoid causing pain to others. To, as
the old saying goes, treat others the way we would like to be treated.
Then again, such thinking may be nothing more than “political
correctness.”