You hear it
all the time at writer’s workshops: write what you know.
I don’t
believe a word of it. Writing about what you know about seems to me a recipe
for repetition and stagnation.
Instead, write what you want to know. The best
writers are inherently curious, always seeking—through reading or travel or
whatever—to learn something new. You could call it research. And those new
things, whether sought out deliberately or stumbled upon by serendipity, often
find their way into a story, a song, a poem, or a book—usually after
considerably more research and curiosity.
Now, this is
not to say you shouldn’t develop some mastery of the subject—know it, in other
words—before you write about it. For one thing, readers who do know can spot a
phony from afar. For another, writers owe readers a heaping helping of honesty,
truth, and reality along with entertainment. And that’s true whether you’re
writing fiction or nonfiction, poetry or plays, essays or songs, movies or
magazine articles.
Texas poet
Larry D. Thomas would never have imagined The
Goatherd had he not been curious about what life might have been like for a
man who tended goats in long-ago Texas. Michael Zimmer would not have written
the outstanding novel Beneath a Hunter’s
Moon had he not wondered about the somewhat obscure Métis and their ways.
We would not have South Pass had Will
Bagley not set out to discover the finer points of exploration and emigrant
travel over the Continental Divide’s easiest crossing. And so on.
Don’t let
your writing be limited by the limits of your knowledge by believing the lie
that you should write what you know. Learn something new. Then, you’ll come to
know what you write—and so will your readers.
WELL SAID!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Les.
DeleteI don't disagree, Rod, but from a commercial perspective, it's a little more complicated.--Gary Goldstein, Editorial Director, Kensington Books
ReplyDeleteThanks, Gary. I don't do complicated very well, being simple-minded and all.
DeleteGreat post, Rod --Dick Vaughan
ReplyDeleteThanks, Dick.
DeleteThought-provoking article, Rod. Yet another caveat is that you can sometimes write about something you don't "know" as long as you don't pretend to know it. Sometimes writing about something from a fresh perspective...with "new eye's"...can be very interesting. Keep'em coming!
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely right, Jim. "New" is almost always refreshing.
DeleteGood insight for all of us, Rod. Some of my best story ideas are those I stumbled on. I love that 'Aha moment' when you think 'really?' 'I never knew that.' That's when that thing inside your head says take a deeper dive and off you go on some new adventure. The only problem is those ideas don't come along every day. It would be nice if you could come up with a systematic way to find them. Random stumbling seems so inefficient and it is. Such is the nature of the creative process.
ReplyDeleteFor me, Paul, "random stumbling" IS an everyday occurrence. Inefficient, certainly, but if it were easy....
DeleteKey word, "serendipity," Rod. Just yesterday I needed to know when Listerine was first compounded (1903) to ensure that the protagonist of my novel, set in 1938, might credibly swallow some before a first date. Well, come to find out, the damned stuff was once advertised as a cure for STDs and dandruff as well. My book is richer for the smell now of mouthwash in the night. Take care, buddy.
ReplyDeleteGreat story, John. What we "don't know" can make all our stories richer, I think.
Delete