Plenty of
historians pooh-pooh Dee Brown’s Bury My
Heart at Wounded Knee, complaining, among other things, it’s one-sided.
Two things
about that.
First of
all, Brown’s stated intention was to present the history of westward expansion
from the perspective of the Indian tribes, which he did.
Second, it’s
not as if the histories scholars had given us until that time were in any sense
balanced. In fact, virtually no historian gave a fig about the Indian side of
things until Brigham Madsen started researching and writing about it back in
the 1950s. And very few followed suit until Brown’s book popularized the approach.
All that
aside, Brown’s book opened the eyes of many Americans when it was released back
in 1970. It certainly opened mine when I read it a year or two later while in
college. (I wore out the mass-market paperback I bought back then and years ago
upgraded to a trade paperback edition.) It was—and is—fascinating reading.
Engaging, certainly, and informative. Even entertaining, though not in the
traditional sense.
If you
haven’t read Bury My Heart at Wounded
Knee do so. It’s still in print and readily available all these years
later.
And don’t
worry if you find it not exactly balanced—there are shelves full of history
books that upset the scales in the other direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment